TheTaxBook - Real Answers, Real Fast

Go Back   TMI Message Board > Discussion Forums > Main Forum / Tax Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2009, 05:53 PM
equinecpa equinecpa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 372
Default Medical Reimbursement Plan

I have a client setting up a medical reimbursement plan -one spouse will employ the other.

My question: The spouse employing the other also has a regular W-2 job and has insurance coverage through that employment. The co-pays and premiums related to this insurance wouldn't be deductible in the medical reimbursement plan would they?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:59 PM
JG EA JG EA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,542
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by equinecpa View Post
I have a client setting up a medical reimbursement plan -one spouse will employ the other.

My question: The spouse employing the other also has a regular W-2 job and has insurance coverage through that employment. The co-pays and premiums related to this insurance wouldn't be deductible in the medical reimbursement plan would they?
Here are some quotes from pub 969
Quote:
A health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) must be funded solely by an employer. The contribution cannot be paid through a voluntary salary reduction agreement on the part of an employee. Employees are reimbursed tax free for qualified medical expenses up to a maximum dollar amount for a coverage period. An HRA may be offered with other health plans, including FSAs.
Quote:
You do not have to be covered under any other health care plan to participate.

Self-employed persons are not eligible for an HRA.

Quote:
For an HRA to maintain tax-qualified status, employers must comply with certain requirements that apply to other accident and health plans. Chapters 1 and 2 of Publication 15-B, Employer's Tax Guide to Fringe Benefits, explain these requirements.
I'm sure you know all these and if it is being set up by an agency - they will know.

Quote:
Qualified medical expenses. Qualified medical expenses are those specified in the plan that would generally qualify for the medical and dental expenses deduction. These are explained in Publication 502, Medical and Dental Expenses. However, even though non-prescription medicines (other than insulin) do not qualify for the medical and dental expenses deduction, they do qualify as expenses for HRA purposes.

Qualified medical expenses from your HRA include the following.
Amounts paid for health insurance premiums.

Amounts paid for long-term care coverage.

Amounts that are not covered under another health plan.
Your question isn't really answered here but since premiums are allowed I would think co-pays would be.

Now my question to you is are you in a community property state? Then the two could be considered one entity therefore not allowing this type of deduction. That would depend on state law I would think.
__________________
JG
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2009, 08:01 PM
JG EA JG EA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,542
Default

Another consideration:

Does the cost to set up such a plan plus the cost of payroll (especially if someone else does) out weigh the tax savings of such a plan.
__________________
JG
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:22 PM
Kram BergGold Kram BergGold is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge, Ma
Posts: 868
Default My take

A is the employer and has health insurance. B is the spouse who works for A. If A sets up a medical reimbursement plan for B and B's family then any expneses B incurs for B or other family members could be paid for by the medical reimbursement plan. Remember, B has to pay the bill an dsubmit it to A for reimbursement. If a pays the bill then this can't be reimbursed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-22-2009, 09:57 AM
dsi dsi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bishop, CA
Posts: 612
Default

Is A self employed?
__________________
Dave, EA
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2009, 02:38 PM
Gretel Gretel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by equinecpa View Post
I have a client setting up a medical reimbursement plan -one spouse will employ the other.

My question: The spouse employing the other also has a regular W-2 job and has insurance coverage through that employment. The co-pays and premiums related to this insurance wouldn't be deductible in the medical reimbursement plan would they?
I agree with your conclusion. Only expenses incurred by the working spouse are reimbursable, just as it would be for any other employee. This at least is the only thing that makes sense to me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-23-2009, 10:30 AM
equinecpa equinecpa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 372
Default

I know the wording used to be that the premium had to be in the EMPLOYEES name and then could cover the spouse (self-employed employer). If in this case the spouse(employer) has coverage through another business (w-2), then the plan won't be in her spouses name and thus the premiums for neither of them would be deductible. I was really wondering about the co-pays..since the spouse employee could pay those out of pocket.

As for cost to set up these plans -they are very negligible and IMO if you can get $10,000 of medical expenses moved from Schedule A to Schedule C -very worthwhile.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-23-2009, 01:12 PM
Gretel Gretel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by equinecpa View Post
I know the wording used to be that the premium had to be in the EMPLOYEES name and then could cover the spouse (self-employed employer). If in this case the spouse(employer) has coverage through another business (w-2), then the plan won't be in her spouses name and thus the premiums for neither of them would be deductible. I was really wondering about the co-pays..since the spouse employee could pay those out of pocket.

As for cost to set up these plans -they are very negligible and IMO if you can get $10,000 of medical expenses moved from Schedule A to Schedule C -very worthwhile.
I thought you were asking about co-pays for owner. I think anything paid by employee-spouse can be reimbursed if it is not for the benefit of owner.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
medical reimbursement oceanlovin'ea Main Forum / Tax Discussion 2 03-02-2009 11:20 AM
PA Medical Reimbursement Plan John of PA Main Forum / Tax Discussion 3 12-04-2007 12:22 PM
OTC in Medical Reimbursement Plan LTaxes Main Forum / Tax Discussion 4 10-28-2006 07:46 AM
Section 105 Medical Reimbursement Plan David Main Forum / Tax Discussion 1 02-09-2006 09:20 AM
Medical Reimbursement Plan Mark Goldberg Main Forum / Tax Discussion 1 11-27-2005 03:45 PM


Disclaimer: This message board allows participants to freely exchange ideas and opinions on areas concerning taxes. The comments posted are the opinions of participants and not that of Tax Materials, Inc. We make no claim as to the accuracy of the information and will not be held liable for any damages caused by using such information. Tax Materials, Inc. reserves the right to delete or modify inappropriate postings.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.